Saturday 20 February 2021

Ask for the old paths and walk therein

I've mentioned before my old copy of No Through Road. It was published by the AA in 1975 and contains details of 205 walks across the length and breadth of England, Scotland and Wales. Time moves on, and inevitably the walk descriptions become less accurate with every passing year. Last Monday, however, I decided it would be fun to try out the only walk in the book that's local to me – Edge End.


I immediately hit a problem.  The car park and picnic site at the starting point no longer exists. Fortunately, though, I soon found a convenient pull-in on a nearby road.


Thankfully, the footpath between the former car park and Worral Hill is still there, even though most of it is not shown on OS maps. A Post Office, mentioned at point 3 of the walk, has however passed into history.


The wide track, half left, was clear enough, but of the stile there was no trace.  Notice how much the trees have grown since the artist sketched this scene, more than 46 years ago. 



Those same trees have obliterated the artist's view down the valley towards Lydbrook, consequently this photo is the best that I could manage.  Incidentally, the guide mentions that Lydbrook's main street, at over a mile long, is reputed to be the longest of any village in England – an accolade that I feel sure actually belongs to Coombe Martin, in Devon.  Sorry, Lydbrook!


The No Through Road walk mentions 5 stiles on this walk, none of which now exist. I think I'm standing where number 3 once stood. 


This seemed a good spot to stop for a picnic essential sustenance. 


Streams abound in the Forest of Dean, but it's unusual to find one confined to a concrete channel.  No Through Road offers no explanation, nor does it mention the stream's strange name – Ropehouse Ditch. According to the website Edward Hunt's Forest of Dean Miscellany, miners wished to improve the flow of this stream and used wire rope from abandoned mines to reinforce the concrete.  Well, I supposed that explains the rope bit of the name, but why house?  Mmmm.


About 500 yards before point 9 of the walk, an old spoil heap, now covered with trees, was clearly visible in the distance.  

The large spoil heap was difficult to spot at point 9, as it looked like a natural hill, so I was glad to have spotted it earlier. 46 years ago it must have been much more obvious.  The stone sets, which used to secure the rails of the old Wimberry Tramway were, however, as clear as ever. 


Here's something that wasn't mentioned in No Through Road – a tipper wagon under a corrugated iron shelter and a small heap of coal.  I presume it's something to do with the nearby Hopewell Free Mine.


On this 1920 OS map I've circled the location of the tipper wagon in red.  The blue oval marks the place where the Wimberry Tramroad (from the left) met a branch of the Severn & Wye Railway (from the right).





We followed the course of the tramway until it fizzled out amid some old quarry workings. When I spotted this old tunnel mouth, I thought I must have found an entrance to Hopewell mine....


... but this 1878 map shows that it was just a tramway tunnel to another part of the quarry.  As you can doubtless tell, I love trying to relate present-day features to the old OS maps. 


Finally, something of a mystery.  The last point on this walk was No.12 - The Machen Oak. The 1975 illustration clearly shows the tree enclosed by a fence, but no fence was to be found.  I think, though, that this must be the oak in question. Already some 350 years old in 1975, it is, you may notice, a little the worse for wear. Perhaps, in a forest of countless trees, it was felt unnecessary to preserve a fence around one ancient oak.

Edward Machen surely deserves something in the forest to keep alive his name.  Back in the early 1800s he was the first of what we would now term a Deputy Surveyor of the Forest and had a profound impact on the Forest landscape that survives to this day. 


__________

Well I hope you've enjoyed reading about this 5 mile walk as much as I enjoyed hiking it, photographing it, delving into old maps and recording it on this blog. It does show that books of walks never truly lose their usefulness.



Saturday 6 February 2021

Upgrading to the Samsung S20 FE

Last week EE informed me that my phone contract was nearing its end and that, should I wish, I could select a newer model – at a cost (of course).  This was my chance, I reasoned, to upgrade to a phone with a decent telephoto lens. As followers of this blog will know, I love to go for moderately long walks and have often regretted setting out without my rather bulky Canon bridge camera, with its lovely zoom lens.  "If only I could get a good photo of that distant mountain, or that group of deer in a far-off clearing!"

I won't bore you by describing the day that I spent, looking through specifications and prices of several contenders; suffice to say that I finally chose the Samsung S20 FE, which has a 'x3' telephoto and some rather nifty software that appeared to give good results up to 'x12'.

Last Monday, anxious to discover whether doubling my monthly rental had been a good move, I took both phones into the Forest of Dean for some comparative photos.   

The first pair were taken on the former railway line between Parkend and Coleford, though unfortunately not from quite the same spot.  Silly me.

Huawei P Smart

Samsung S20 FE

Which do you prefer?  Do you not feel that the Samsung's colours look a bit washed-out?  In comparison, the Huawei's clever AI (artificial intelligence) feature has enhanced the colours. It was the Huawei's good camera that drew me to choosing it, two years ago.

So was the Samsung a waste of money?  Not really.  Look again at the trees on the left, that on the Huawei shot look almost as green as the moss and lichen on the stones.  

Samsung S20 FE, enhanced

Here's the Samsung photo after I tweaked the saturation. You may feel that I've overdone it, but I like it. See now the colour detail in the fallen leaves. More importantly, look at those tree trunks, which are not green at all, but a lovely silver colour. I think you'll agree that the Samsung photo wins on colour interpretation and fineness of detail.

Next I went to Darkhill, the site of a pioneering iron works.  On the hill above the old ironworks is the entrance to Marefold, and in front of it a large lump of slag from the iron-making process.

Huawei P Smart

Samsung S20 FE

By now, watery sunshine was piercing the clouds.  This time, I prefer the Samsung photo, which is crisper and more true to life.  It was time, though, to try out the Samsung's 'x3' telephoto. For comparison, I zoomed the Huawei's digital zoom to 'x3'. 

Huawei P Smart

Samsung S20 FE

No contest!  The Huawei photo is good, but the Samsung one is, I'm sure you'll agree, far better.  

Finally, I tested the Samsung's digital zoom performance by zooming in to 'x12'.  Since the Huawei was incapable of zooming this much, I took the previous Huawei photo and used an app on my computer to create a comparable shot.  

Huawei P Smart

Samsung S20 FE

Here was proof indeed that my money had been well spent.  

Finally, a word on the contract prices.  Had I elected to stick with my Huawei P Smart, a SIM-only contract would have cost me £16 per month.  The S20 FE is costing £39 per month, so for the next two years I'll be forking out an extra £23 per month – that's a total of £552 – for the phone.  

Samsung UK and Curry's will sell you one for £599. Portus Digital's price is £499, but the best deal I found was with Ultra Online at £409.  That looks to be quite a saving, until you read the TrustPilot reviews for Ultra Online.  Diabolical puts is mildly!  Portus Digital, however, is much better, so there are clearly savings to be made in buying the phone and going for a SIM-only contract. Next time, maybe.